Tereau v. Meeds

Per Curiam. This case is substantially identical with Ward v. Meeds, supra, page 18, 130 N. W. 2 , and the same conclusion is reached. There was no error in submitting to the jury the question whether the plaintiff and Brills, the driver of the vehicle, were engaged in a joint enterprise. Tile evidence made the question one of fact. The question of Brills’ contributory negligence was also one for the jury. Judgment affirmed.